There are three main phases of the church budget process. All budget processes have components of these three phases. Therefore, by understanding them, you’re on the right track to managing your church budget process with ease.

Phase 1: Budget Formulation

The budget formulation stage includes gathering relevant policies, soliciting information from staff and parishioners, documenting assumptions, and projecting revenues and expenses. By developing a resource plan to put priorities into action, collaboration and transparency are critical to this phase of the budget process to ensure openness, buy-in, and accountability by the entire parish community.

Phase 2: Budget Execution

Once the budget is approved, budget execution is the phase when the plan is put into action. The key features of budget execution include establishing and communicating clear policies and procedures for the receipt and disbursement of resources and ensuring financial transparency.

Phase 3: Budget Control

Budget control processes and procedures are established to ensure that the parish meets planned targets for revenue and expenses. If challenges arise or circumstances change for any reason, tools like variance analysis help parish leaders assess the impact of changes and proactively mitigate financial risks.

Now that we have a basic understanding of the budget phases, next week, we will review the different components of what we will call – The Master Budget!

Which budget method(s) do you use when you create your church budget?  How do you estimate revenues and expenses? Last week we discussed top-down budgeting! This week, let’s take a look at bottom-up budgeting.

Bottom-up Budgeting

Sometimes referred to as zero-based budgeting, the bottom-up method involves building a budget from the lowest income/expense elements and then rolling them up into the total budget request. From zero, each cost element is developed and justified. Therefore when the budget is complete, the program manager has a thorough understanding of the budget under their management.

Advantages/Challenges

The advantage of this method is that each cost element is scrutinized and justified in order to develop the budget. The challenge to this type of method is that it can be time-consuming due to the comprehensive nature of building from zero up.

Therefore, the leader might consider using this method for one department at a time or taking a bottom-up approach every other year so that the process is not overwhelming for those involved in building the budget.

For example, maybe you start with the Music program, and the following year, review the Religious Education program. When a budget has been developed using the bottom-up approach method, the insight into a program/department is typically very good.

Another advantage of this method is that the detailed analysis provides a level of granularity not necessarily achieved by top-down budgeting. With top-down budgeting, the dollars are broken out from a broader perspective, whereas the bottom-up method creates a more precise estimate of program costs.

Can you figure out what the greatest challenge to implementing a bottom-up budget method? You guessed it; the method can cause anxiety. People may feel like you are scrutinizing them and get defensive. Help staff to understand the answer to questions like, “Why me?” or “Why my program?” Be truthful. If you are asking for staff to build a bottom-up budget because you are concerned about overspending, let them know. We often think that we don’t want to concern staff. But guess what? They become concerned anyway.

When you answer the “why?” question truthfully, watch as build buy-in and rapport. People are happy to help build a great budget when they are clear about expectations and outcomes.

Photo Credit: mripp Flickr via Compfight cc

Portions of this text are excerpted from Parish Finance: Best Practices in Church Management (Mahwah: Paulist Press, 2016), Chapter 4

Previously we have discussed how to construct a church financial narrative with impact and ease. However, we all know that writing about money is simple when finances are in great shape. Inevitably, church financial challenges occur and also need to be communicated.

Address Financial Challenges with 3-R

For example, from a decrease in collections, the parish drew a larger percentage of endowment funds than in previous years. Responding to financial challenges can feel overwhelming, but consider breaking the problem down using the 3-R Approach. The first step is to Reflect what has occurred. What is the actual data telling you about what happened? The second step is to Review reasons or circumstances and consider any changes that are necessary for the future. The third step is to Refine any policies and procedures to mitigate the likelihood that the problem will occur again.

When reporting a challenging situation, keep the narrative simple, straightforward, and offer answers to the relevant “W” questions.

• What happened?
• Who is/was involved?
• When did it take place?
• Why did it happen?

So, we have constructed the financial narrative, we have addressed any challenges, now what? Let’s choose the most compelling visuals to include in your financial reports. Next week we discuss choosing visuals to communication financial understanding!

Read More Church Finance 30/30 Tips